Everyone has their own standards
to define what are early to them and what are not. And while considering about
matters requiring discerning decision makings like the marriage itself,
standards for earliness and delay are even more idiosyncratic; they
vary with individuals. UNICEF defines early marriage as marriage before the age
of 18 while Marriage Registration Act, 1971 of Nepal keeps that minimum legal
age of marriage at 20 (and 18 with parental consent). Now, these are different
tales to tell and going over these definitions would require me to talk about
legal provisions and aspects from perspective of violation of laws and criminal
offenses which, right now, are not the topics of this discussion. There are
women to whom even 28 years is just too early to find themselves tied in knots
and then we have women who believe they can find the most suitable partners for
themselves even before the age of 20. The standards can vary this way or even
in the most eccentric manners; it depends on individual preferences and in a
country like Nepal, might also primarily depend on preferences of the family
and the society. Though the median age of first marriage is 17.5 years among
Nepalese women as Nepal Demographic Health Survey 2011 mentions, the discussion
here is not only about these women who fall below the minimum legal age requirements
but also about those who are in their 20s, 30s or even more. I believe, any
period where women think they are not ready to get married is their “early”
time for marriage. There could be biological, psychological, professional,
cultural or any other reasons behind but if they feel they are not just ready
for marriage then it’s an early marriage to them. Having mentioned that, keep
yourself poised as the business in this discourse is going to be solely from
the moral dimensions and not the legal ones.
In a country
where a man and a woman preferring each other as their life partners is not the
“only prerequisite” to settle for marriage, doctrines of society influencing
decisions for marriage and defining the right age to marry is not a surprise. The
society, including the family, has even more firm reasons to define the right
age of marriage for women. Assuming that our society respects laws of our
country regarding the minimum legal age of marriage, when girls turn 20,
families believe that their daughters are no more girls but women and the right
time to search bridegrooms for them has begun with this age. But pay heed to
the fact that conditions are not the same for boys. Somehow our society
believes that girls get ready much early than boys for marriage with most of
them defining “20 as the entry to marriage” for girls. Some of the reasons
behind this definition of the right age for girls to marry are: 1) Our society
believes that girls age faster after 20 and look old so, won’t get suitable bridegrooms, 2) After 20, their fertility
decreases with age and can’t bear children so,
won’t get suitable bridegrooms, 3) If marriages are postponed even after
20, society will assume that the girl has some flaws or is of questionable
character so, won’t get suitable bridegroom.
So, basically, the reasons are all hovering around the preferences of that “suitable
bridegroom” whom the society doesn’t know, hasn’t met yet but somehow assumes
that he will, in any circumstances, not prefer woman who has crossed her 20s. Now,
let me turn over these reasons: 1) How gender, and not the individual
metabolism and traits, has anything to do with aging process? For an instance, let
us even consider some gene experts who have evidences on this matter, but what
about men developing wrinkles and crow’s feet, and going bald and grey with
their age? Is the youth and beauty relationship only limited to women and not
men? Do wrinkles make women look ugly but make men look mature instead? How
about we ask reasons for questions like these with our society instead? 2) Now
talking about the fertility and women’s age, it’s true that women aren’t
fertile for their entire lives unlike men. But like men, women also consider
being parent as one of the most imperative phases in their lives. There are
different facts on what is the ideal age to bear children but any fact clearly
denies the statement that women can’t deliver after late 20s. We have a science
called the menstruation that explicitly explains when fertility begins and
stops; in no corner of the world menopause happens anywhere around 20s but happens
during late 40s or even later unless any abnormal health conditions exist. 3)
The third reason, I believe is not even worth of justification because no logic
can explain what age and marriage has to do with someone’s character. So, you
may now wonder what is the right age for any woman to get married? I don’t know
and the world doesn’t know either, only the woman herself can tell. Any age
when a woman feels she is ready to be in a marriage is the right age for her.
But you and I both know explaining this to our conventional society isn’t an
easy job and moreover, it’s very enduring for even women to follow the heresy
of refusing to marry early.
Our society not
only has its own definition on right age to marry but also has its own ways to
bring and accept marriage proposals. And mark my words, most of these proposals
have nothing to do with what and how the girl wants these things to happen.
There are actually three types of marriage proposals engendering three
different types of marriages in our society: 1) The first one is the proposal
which family of the to-be-bridegroom makes to family of the to-be-bride. This
type of proposals were the foundations of our past and are still, mainly in our
rural communities. When a girl turns to the society’s right age of marriage,
her parents and relatives start searching for bridegrooms of common culture
through their own marriage networks. These networks are so swift and strong
that it doesn’t take much time for the news to reach the man who is in
search of a bride. After acquiring superficial information about the girl, the
to-be-bridegroom and his family bring marriage proposal to her family where
both families analyze the relation. Age is not a necessary criterion for the
man, there are other measures for him like his wealth, career, education etc.
but to a woman, she has to be in that range of right age, be good looking and
know household works while other measures like her education, career etc. are
just ‘not major’. Basically, this type of proposal is made between two families
and the marriage is called the arranged marriage. 2) The second type of
proposal is the one that is made between the girl and the boy who are in love
and who know their families won’t agree to their relationship so instead put
proposals to only their partners and elope for secret marriage. Society often assorts
such marriage as the love marriage. 3) The last type of proposal is the one
that is made between the two families whose kids have fell for each other, want
to get married but also want their families to agree on this. These families
either agree that the partners their kids have chosen were suitable or force
themselves to agree as such in order to avoid eloped marriage. These families
however still make proposals to each other making it appear as the arranged
marriage to the society. Nonetheless, the latter one is still much better than
the first two types. But here we will only chew over the first type of proposal
where women rarely have their say to decide about their own marriages.
After a girl turns 20, her parents have plenty of their relatives bringing names of boys for marriage, they finally screen some and their local marriage network connects them to families of boys, then the boy and his parents evaluate the girl and finally the marriage is decided after meeting between both the parties. So, you might wonder what role did the girl perform in this entire sequence? Well, maybe turning 20, at least the society considers this as an instrumental aspect. Some women might as well have their say on which boy was better among the lists of boys their families had offered; but are they asked if they want to marry in the first place? Are they asked if they are happy with this decision of their families? Do they have a say at this? Maybe and maybe not! They could be the brilliant students of their schools, could have aspirations to pursue a specific career, could have different plans for their futures, could have different criteria for their life partners, could have different opinions on marriage and above all, could just not be ready for such a huge step. We have gender laws, policies, reservations etc. all demanding equality and equity but what about letting women to decide about their marriages? We don’t have provisions on this but don’t we have even responsibilities on this? Has our society ever pressurized men to get married in their early 20s? Has any man sacrificed his career and aspirations to get married? Was any man not given an opportunity to decide about his marriage and choose his life partner? This might seem exaggerated for the new generation and many people might even think this should be happening only in the rural areas. If so, why even an urban woman who is in her late 20s or 30s has difficulty to find a life partner? We have many men who decide to get married at 30s but still easily get women much younger than themselves. But is the situation otherwise? Very rare! The problem is not that men have the privilege to decide; the problem is that women don’t.
There are many such women I can exemplify who are not only good looking but also have achieved successes in their careers but later seemed to regret that their time and path to success costed them their marriages. If women of our country are lamenting on choosing their aspirations over their marriages, then as a democratic nation we have failed. Moreover, as human beings we have failed if we are making women to choose between their progress and their married life. One can say women can even fulfill their dreams after marriage but it isn’t that simple as we debate. No matter how understanding the husband is, life is never the same, situations are never the same and even the priorities no longer remain the same for a woman after her marriage. When a slight displacement of our pillow can disturb our sleep and change visuals of our recurring dreams, a major change in a woman’s life and her relations can imperceptibly change her priorities too. Unless men and the entire society provide women time to develop themselves before marriage, appreciate them by their wisdom and their conduct rather than by their age and looks, consider and support them with their decisions regarding their marriages and stop standardizing the right age of marriage, the status quo of our women will never ameliorate. Hence, if someone needs to take the first step, it has to be the men who can act as change agents and redefine society’s perspectives on marriage and women.
After a girl turns 20, her parents have plenty of their relatives bringing names of boys for marriage, they finally screen some and their local marriage network connects them to families of boys, then the boy and his parents evaluate the girl and finally the marriage is decided after meeting between both the parties. So, you might wonder what role did the girl perform in this entire sequence? Well, maybe turning 20, at least the society considers this as an instrumental aspect. Some women might as well have their say on which boy was better among the lists of boys their families had offered; but are they asked if they want to marry in the first place? Are they asked if they are happy with this decision of their families? Do they have a say at this? Maybe and maybe not! They could be the brilliant students of their schools, could have aspirations to pursue a specific career, could have different plans for their futures, could have different criteria for their life partners, could have different opinions on marriage and above all, could just not be ready for such a huge step. We have gender laws, policies, reservations etc. all demanding equality and equity but what about letting women to decide about their marriages? We don’t have provisions on this but don’t we have even responsibilities on this? Has our society ever pressurized men to get married in their early 20s? Has any man sacrificed his career and aspirations to get married? Was any man not given an opportunity to decide about his marriage and choose his life partner? This might seem exaggerated for the new generation and many people might even think this should be happening only in the rural areas. If so, why even an urban woman who is in her late 20s or 30s has difficulty to find a life partner? We have many men who decide to get married at 30s but still easily get women much younger than themselves. But is the situation otherwise? Very rare! The problem is not that men have the privilege to decide; the problem is that women don’t.
There are many such women I can exemplify who are not only good looking but also have achieved successes in their careers but later seemed to regret that their time and path to success costed them their marriages. If women of our country are lamenting on choosing their aspirations over their marriages, then as a democratic nation we have failed. Moreover, as human beings we have failed if we are making women to choose between their progress and their married life. One can say women can even fulfill their dreams after marriage but it isn’t that simple as we debate. No matter how understanding the husband is, life is never the same, situations are never the same and even the priorities no longer remain the same for a woman after her marriage. When a slight displacement of our pillow can disturb our sleep and change visuals of our recurring dreams, a major change in a woman’s life and her relations can imperceptibly change her priorities too. Unless men and the entire society provide women time to develop themselves before marriage, appreciate them by their wisdom and their conduct rather than by their age and looks, consider and support them with their decisions regarding their marriages and stop standardizing the right age of marriage, the status quo of our women will never ameliorate. Hence, if someone needs to take the first step, it has to be the men who can act as change agents and redefine society’s perspectives on marriage and women.
Overall it is very good. Some lines invigorated me as a man.
ReplyDeleteThanks! and it should indeed
Delete